In a notable advancement, the Supreme Court of india has reaffirmed its previous position regarding the amended Waqf Act. During a hearing on Tuesday, the Chief Justice emphasized that the court cannot intervene unless a specific case is presented. As the hearings continue, the court is set to address multiple public interest litigations challenging the amended law, which has sparked considerable debate across the nation.
The court’s reluctance to intervene without a formal case highlights the delicate balance between legislative authority and judicial oversight. Following the amendment, numerous public interest litigations were filed, yet the Supreme Court has chosen to focus on just three key issues. Firstly,properties declared as Waqf cannot be removed from the Waqf list. Secondly, while district collectors may manage disputed Waqf properties, their decisions will lack legitimacy.Lastly, the inclusion of non-Muslim or Hindu members in the Waqf Board raises questions about representation and governance. As these hearings unfold,they not only reflect the complexities of religious property management but also resonate with broader themes of community rights and constitutional integrity in India.
