Calcutta High Court Hears Controversial Case on 32,000 Primary Teacher Job Cancellations
In a significant legal battle, the Calcutta High Court is deliberating on the cancellation of 32,000 primary teacher jobs in West Bengal, a case that has stirred considerable debate over allegations of corruption and procedural irregularities. the West Bengal Board of primary Education (WBBPE) has argued that there is no concrete evidence of bribery linked to these job appointments. The boardS lawyer, Kishore Dutta, emphasized that mere non-compliance with regulations does not equate to corruption, raising questions about the validity of the previous court’s directive.
The case revolves around the assertion that the previous judge, Abhijit Gangopadhyay, issued his order based on insufficient evidence. Dutta contended that even if one where to accept the premise of corruption for argument’s sake, the foundational evidence and applications that led to the judge’s ruling were questionable. This ongoing legal discourse not only highlights the complexities of the recruitment process in the education sector but also reflects broader concerns about governance and accountability in public service appointments. As the court continues to hear arguments, the implications of this case could resonate far beyond the immediate parties involved, potentially impacting the future of educational employment in the state.
